View Single Post
Old 04-08-2015, 10:26 PM   #36 (permalink)
mikeyjd
Master EcoModder
 
mikeyjd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 838

Matchbox - '93 Ford Festiva L
Team Ford
Last 3: 70.16 mpg (US)

Salamander - '99 Chrysler Concorde LXI
Team Dodge
90 day: 30.3 mpg (US)

Urquhart - '97 Toyota Tacoma 4x4 V6 3.4L DLX
Pickups
90 day: 25.81 mpg (US)

Smudge - '98 Toyota Tacoma
90 day: 40.65 mpg (US)

Calebro - '15 Renault Trafic 1.25 dci
90 day: 39.39 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,380
Thanked 209 Times in 155 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cosmick View Post
No, that's a gear ratio, which may not even be correct, I'm seeing spec elsewhere listed as 3.58:1.
Anyway, I don't see the point of flatbeds on anything less than a full on 1-ton dually, but especially not on mini-pickups. However, since I moved to farm country, I've seen the value as well as the overloading I expected to see.
If you're going to work it heavy, GAWR matters, lest you destroy rear axles.
The weight rating for that axle is proving impossible to find, but is easy to infer from the tires Toyota offered with it. Standard 195/75R14s are rated to 1400# ea., but 215/70R14 was optional, those are rated at 1565# each. That would give a 3130# rating, which lines up pretty well with the payload rating, and with the competition. GM was 2900#, for example.
If you're going to load up, the strongest upgrade of easy availability, low cost, and similar gearing is the popular Ford Explorer 8.8" which, because it is just a narrow F150 axle with F150 tube, bearing, and shaft specs, is good to 3800#. And 3.5454545:1 gearing is common, as are limited-slip differentials. Ford called them Traction-Lock.
Maybe this won't help you, but having done several such axle upgrades, I can say the peace of mind alone is worth the hassle.
If you want to try taller gearing, the 8.8 offers ratios down to 2.47:1, which I know the 'yota doesn't begin to approach.
There are problems, I can list them all if anyone wishes, but this is enough food for thought today.
Sorry I thought you were asking the gear ratio. I wasn't familiar with the term GAWR.

The point of a flatbed for me is that appliances don't weigh a lot but take up a lot of space. It's hard to fit 4 in a standard Tacoma bed.

I'm not sure if it's worth messing with the rear setup for me at this point. I'm sure the explorer offers a much more robust setup, but I think my current setup is suited for my purposes for now at least. Taller gearing would be nice in some ways, but the current gearing is working pretty well as I spend a lot of my driving time on back roads where I'm able to take advantage of the lower gearing.


Quote:
Originally Posted by spacemanspif View Post
If 6 washers/dryers fit on the bed and the average weight is ~200lbs, he's looking at 1200lbs in payload when fully loaded. I'd think that is within the duty rating of the axle not considering difference in weights between the wood and steel bed.

Side note: Does the bed slope down toward the back? Hope the frame isn't bent in the middle...
The bed sits about an inch low in back do to improper shimming of the 4x4 during contruction of the bed. The frame is completely straight and intact. The average dryer I haul is 100lbs and the average washer is 120lbs. The heaviest machines are 200 and I wouldn't attempt to haul 6 at once without a trailer.
  Reply With Quote