View Single Post
Old 04-10-2015, 08:15 PM   #8 (permalink)
Hersbird
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,653

Dark Egg - '12 VW Touraeg
Thanks: 301
Thanked 1,178 Times in 807 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
YES: http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...0-a-18667.html



----

Engine swaps aside...

What are you averaging in your Saturn? How high above its EPA highway rating is that?

Do a rough calculation: apply the same % difference to the Miata's highway rating for the same driving speeds/style. It won't be exact, but it'll get you in the ballpark. Knock some more off for top-down motoring.
That's a good idea assuming the cars are similar, both small, both manuals. The EPA test seems to in a way penalize larger cars on the city and highway test, and aerodynamic cars on the highway test. Why that 2002 4cylinder Camry thread shows such good highway cruise MPG even though the EPA claims it's not stellar. The EPA test makes the car drive like a moron is behind the wheel... and yet the general population complains they can't even get EPA numbers. I think manuals also do a lot better then EPA also, again driving for economy.

A lighter car isn't as penalized with brisk acceleration and heavy braking as physics says it just is easier to do with less mass. The areodynamics don't help much as the speeds of the tests are pretty low, the average speed on the highway test is only 48.3 MPH even on the "high speed" test.
  Reply With Quote