Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyLugNut
A bit more thought and on topic discussion would be a courtesy - weather for or against.
Isaacs rebuttal is a goodly read.
|
While I agree Isaacs rebuttal is much more detailed. the device appears to be the same quackery that spins around every time fuel prices jump for an extended period of time.
The cynicism in my response, was more from the prospective of having purchased and used many of these types of devices in the past and the wishing that others avoid making the same exact error.
While we can disagree whether my response was merited, Why is one more detailed response better than a lesser and, yes, glib, response? isn't there room for all points of view or writing style of responses?