View Single Post
Old 06-15-2015, 06:46 AM   #218 (permalink)
aardvarcus
Master EcoModder
 
aardvarcus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Evensville, TN
Posts: 676

Deep Blue - '94 GMC Suburban K2500 SLE
90 day: 23.75 mpg (US)

Griffin (T4R) - '99 Toyota 4Runner SR5
90 day: 25.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 237
Thanked 580 Times in 322 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
I've looked at them and these are some of the reasons I was put off by them.
*they have exposed, dry, ball bearings with a very loose pre-load.
*They'd have to go from 'zero',to a fairly large angular velocity instantly (30-mph left-hand turns through green-lighted intersections).
*If I greased them,there's no facility for dust seals.
*I live on an unimproved road with a lot of dust which eats unprotected bearings.
I've got some stuff with sealed bearings to play with which is a larger diameter than the originals which will reduce the surface feet per minute,probably an improvement.If I have to move the poles outward much I can always enclose them in streamlined blisters if they poke out.
Thank you for the feedback, I was a little concerned about the longevity of the bearings, so your points about the lack of dust seals reinforces my fears that they may not last, even if they were greased initially. How about this idea then, instead of using lazy-susan type bearings use one real automotive quality sealed bearing (like a rear bearing from a front wheel drive car) with a through bolt to hold the plastic right in the center? Thoughts?
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aardvarcus For This Useful Post:
aerohead (06-15-2015)