View Single Post
Old 06-20-2015, 02:01 PM   #89 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,320
Thanks: 24,442
Thanked 7,387 Times in 4,784 Posts
possible

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vman455 View Post
I'm curious what we are to make of the efficiency increase with the initial round of aeromods, before the kammback and tail were added. 15% improvement with wheel covers, grill blocks, mirror delete, etc; then the tail did hardly anything. Is it possible Metro just happened to hit a plateau in engine efficiency?
We're kinda at a point where we'd need a laboratory and an engine map for Metro's car.
We can speculate for ever.The science says we're looking at a BSFC problem.This dates at least to 1934,with the Chrysler DeSoto aerodynamic test mule based upon the Airflow.They are the first to report on the problem.Dr. Gino Sovran of GM Labs and SAE published a paper reflecting on the problem.Ditto Wolf Heinrich Hucho.
Unless the engine can be shifted back to it's original BSFC it doesn't matter how much we reduce rolling resistance or aerodynamic drag.We're gonna be facing this demon."Gear-matching" has historically been the solution to the problem.
Whatever rpm occurs at the original top speed,gear the streamlined car to be at exactly the same rpm at it's new higher top speed.



__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
BamZipPow (06-20-2015), ECONORAM (06-22-2015), Joggernot (06-23-2015)