View Single Post
Old 07-02-2015, 02:27 PM   #1 (permalink)
Daox
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
Help me understand cam timing, advancing or retarding a SOHC for mpg

I've been reading up a little on cam timing. I know that advancing the cam timing pushes the powerband to a lower rpm, and retarding it pushes it to a higher rpm. However, I'm not really interested in my powerband as much. I'm interested in getting good fuel economy. Most of the info out there is mostly on how to make more power... bleh.

The wikipedia on variable cam timing says that advancing AND retarding intake cam timing can be good for fuel efficiency. Thats not super helpful. It seems to indicate that advancing the exhaust cam is good for fuel economy, and retarding it is good for power.

I'm also mainly thinking about the Metro which is a SOHC. I don't have the ability to advance just the intake cam because there is only one cam.

So, I'm thinking I want to advance the cam timing, but not 100% sure why, and I'd really love to fully understand it. I know the atkinson cycle engines retard it so it pushes some of the intake charge out the valves, but thats retarding the cam, not advancing.

Does anyone have some good resources, or a great explanation as to why advancing or retarding is good for fuel efficiency.

__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote