View Single Post
Old 07-17-2015, 10:29 PM   #54 (permalink)
IamIan
Master EcoModder
 
IamIan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 692
Thanks: 371
Thanked 227 Times in 140 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by P-hack View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by IamIan
Results = reality .. not what one 'chooses'

Observation to-date does not agree with your if above.
Oh, so populations of animals with low fertility rates don't die out :/
Three aspects:

#1>
Results = Reality .. weather that result was 'chosen' or not.

'choose' to have a child .. but fail to conceive .. Result = no child = reality.

Choice has finite influence on result ... Result = Reality .. even if the result is not what one 'chose'.

- - - - - -

#2>
That low fertility group you describe might die out , or it might not die out at all .. it might thrive , it might not thrive .. it depends on more than just fertility rate ... Survival of the fittest .. fittest does not necessarily mean the most fertile.

There have been numerous species that have died out .. even if they had a higher fertility rate than other species that did not die out.

A high fertility rate is only one contributing factor toward how 'fit' a group / species is in a given environment / context.

- - - - - - -

#3>
Yes Observations to-date (reducing population % growth rate) .. does not agree with your previous hypothetical :
"if we breed out those who choose to self-reduce"

Soo far ... data , to-date .. refutes .. shows that specific hypothetical is not happening.

If that changes in the future .. than it will manifest itself as a increasing % global growth rate.

Quote:
Originally Posted by P-Hack
My take on it is that a large number of people want a "peaceful" reduction of the population, but observations about evolution have shown that conflict/struggle is necessary for evolutionary progress. I mean if the pacifists die out, then who is left to breed?
My take .. major (globally significant) conflict (war) has numerous other destructive / damaging / counter-productive effects ... it doesn't just kill people.

And (My take) this last ~40 years has had a faster and more globally effective negative contributing influence on total global human population ... than any war in history ever has.

WW2 was about ... ~0.6%/yr influence .. around ~14mil/yr .. for all of ~6 yrs.

The ~2Billion .. not born due to reduced % growth rate .. has been about ~0.7%/yr influence .. ~50mil/yr .. on average for ~40 years .. this is larger total , faster , for longer period of time.
__________________
Life Long Energy Efficiency Enthusiast
2000 Honda Insight - LiFePO4 PHEV - Solar
2020 Inmotion V11 PEV ~30miles/kwh

Last edited by IamIan; 07-17-2015 at 10:41 PM..
  Reply With Quote