View Single Post
Old 07-24-2015, 10:08 PM   #15 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,457

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,212
Thanked 4,390 Times in 3,364 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SDMCF View Post
Why? (From an MPG point of view)
I have not researched this idea myself, but some say that the wider (and shorter in length) contact patch forces the tire to deform less while providing the same total area of contact. In other words, all other things being equal, a wider tire might reduce rolling resistance because the rubber doesn't have to bend as much to provide the same square inches of contact with the road.

The trade-off is that the wider profile is less aerodynamic, which becomes an increasing factor with increasing speed.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote