View Single Post
Old 08-22-2015, 09:33 PM   #7 (permalink)
oldtamiyaphile
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by UltArc View Post
Koenigsegg (the pinnacle of automotive performance) and Lamborghini (the pinnacle of automotive performance for people who don't know about Koenigsegg or much about cars) both have said they aren't wasting their time on hybrids.
The Koenigsegg One is a hybrid. Supposedly the fastest production car in the world. Lamborghini will have to follow Ferrari, Porsche and McLaren into hybrids if they want to be faster than an electric sedan.

As far as aerodynamic drag goes, if you look at all the 'poor' aero cars, they all share a poor fineness ratio, they're tall boxy practical designs that will never match the sleeker shapes from Mercedes or Tesla.

There's also the payback to consider, just like going from 10mpg to 20 is a huge jump, while going from 50mpg to 60 isn't really a lot, going from 0.28 to 0.20 probably isn't worth the cost and (styling and practicality) compromise.
__________________






  Reply With Quote