View Single Post
Old 08-26-2015, 11:40 AM   #6 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
You do realize that a driveshaft or d.s. driven alternator only charges when the vehicle is moving, and at significant speed at that. In the hands of the general public this will result in dead batteries (too much idling).

You also realize that non-belt driven "alternators" are not new or unique; best examples being just about every motorcycle or small engine powered piece of equipment made in the last century. In that regard, I'm not sure why automotive doesn't do something similar. Perhaps it is harder to get the needed capacity, or more expensive. But it could be that the belt drive was there already and it's easy and cheap to glom an alternator on to it.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
Daox (08-26-2015), James O'Neill (08-27-2015), RedDevil (08-26-2015)