View Single Post
Old 09-03-2015, 03:14 PM   #3 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,468

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,214
Thanked 4,391 Times in 3,365 Posts
My Acura says something similar, saying 91 PON is recommended, and anything below 87 PON may cause engine damage.

I've been running 87 PON for years with no adverse affects other than reduced top-end power. The timing is slightly retarded, which may reduce fuel economy ever so slightly, but I don't notice a difference from my fuel logs. I can tell the difference between 87 and 92 PON just by driving the car. My wife used to randomly choose one or the other, and when I went to drive I would correctly identify which grade she choose based on acceleration feel.

Sometimes I'll mix my own, filling about half with 92 PON and then filling the rest with 87 PON. Mid-grade fuel here (89 PON) is simply a mixture of 40% premium and 60% regular, which they charge more for than mixing it yourself.

All this to say, run the cheaper stuff and see if it impacts fuel economy in any noticeable way.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote