View Single Post
Old 09-22-2015, 03:14 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
UFO's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 178 Times in 138 Posts
Originally Posted by holzhoechi View Post

thanks very much for thoughts, I don't want to refute that at all.

I have already an HHO dry cell system installed. I am just about to change the PWM and EFIE controller. With the new PWM/EFIE I should get better fuel economy results.

With the old system, fuel economy about 3 %.
with the new system, I am sure to get more.

But with a HHO system the fuel economy is limited, that's why I want to try to vaporise the fuel first.
Can you explain how you expect to get increased fuel efficiency by vaporizing your fuel if you understand it does not change thermal or combustion efficiency?
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
  Reply With Quote