In terms of the MX-3 vs CRX I think what you are missing is the rear body stuff aerohead mentioned. Yes the MX-3 looks very sleek and streamlined but you are not looking at it against the "template". The CRX most likely fills the back area a little better and maybe even has a rear attachment point with that little spoiler on the back. The MX-3 most likely has detached flow starting at the B-pilar and all the "sleakness" of the back end means nothing. Makes one wonder how much an MX-3 could benefit from a pro-stock style spoiler and reaches "template".
__________________
-Mike
2007 Ford Focus ZX5 - 91k - SGII, pending upper and lower grill bocks - auto trans
1987 Monte Carlo SS - 5.3/4L80E swap - 13.67 @ 106
2007 Ford Focus Estate - 230k - 33mpg - Retired 4/2018
1995 Saturn SL2 - 256K miles - 44mpg - Retired 9/2014
Cost to Operate Spreadsheet for "The New Focus"
|