View Single Post
Old 11-05-2015, 09:49 AM   #32 (permalink)
kach22i
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,184
Thanks: 130
Thanked 2,806 Times in 1,970 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
Why do you need to get 100% efficiency? (Let alone more than 100% :-)) You just need to extract more energy than is needed to overcome the extra drag. And as the examples show, it IS possible to do that, just not practical for daily driving. Rather like the solar cars racing across the Australian Outback.
Perhaps it would help you to abstract this a bit.

Remember in school all of those math problem solving exercises?

The ones where there was a bunch of stuff on the left side, and bunch of stuff on the right side, and an "equal sign" in the middle.

That equal sign was pretty important wasn't it?

Why was that darn thing there anyway you probably asked yourself over and over and yet nobody could give you a satisfactory answer.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
If you've got some peer-reviewed scientific paper which illustrates how we go from 59.3%,to 100+% efficiency with a turbine electric generator 'd love to see that.
What I think aerohead is saying, is that to solve for this problem, both sides of your equation have to equal each other, or complement each other in some way. You cannot have an unequal equation, gotta account for everything or you missed something.

Inequalities ppt revised


Perhaps if someone wrote out an equation showing the energy into the system (power generated), energy out of the system (power used; air drag, rolling resistance) which included the wind turbine as a factor we could all visualize this in a simplified manner and know which category to put things in.

Often defining the problem leads to solving the problem.

In other words, if you cannot define your problem, then you have little hope of solving it.

Identifying the problem is key to it's solution.

You cannot hit what you cannot see, so stop squinting so hard.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote