Thread: EPA Vs NEDC
View Single Post
Old 01-24-2016, 07:01 AM   #8 (permalink)
D.O.G.
Wanting more for less
 
D.O.G.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New South Wales, Australia
Posts: 313

Metric - '94 Honda Magna 250
Motorcycle
90 day: 69.83 mpg (US)

RedCelica - '94 Toyota Celica ZR
90 day: 35.97 mpg (US)

i30 - '12 Hyundai i30 Elite
90 day: 39.84 mpg (US)

i30-22 - '12 Hyundai i30 Elite
90 day: 39.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 23
Thanked 73 Times in 45 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldtamiyaphile View Post
I just wonder if having an agreed multilpier for NEDC rated cars would help spur interest from more Europeans, or at least NEDC on the labels on the garage and signature tags.
I understand your point, but being different tests, there's no direct comparison.

As an example, the 1997 1.8 Mazda Protege (the figures I use for my Astina), rates 23MPG city in the US and rates 26.13 in Australia, 13.6% higher.
The same car rates 29 MPG highway in the US and 36.75 in Australia, 26.7% higher.
Which percentage would you use?

Because the test method is different, different engine/transmission combinations would probably produce different percentage variations even within the same model.
There's probably no "one size fits all" multiplying factor that can reasonably be applied.
__________________



  Reply With Quote