Thread: EPA Vs NEDC
View Single Post
Old 01-24-2016, 07:34 AM   #9 (permalink)
oldtamiyaphile
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by D.O.G. View Post
There's probably no "one size fits all" multiplying factor that can reasonably be applied.
Some Googling suggested a 20% difference on average, but of course there will never be a solid figure. You would of course use the average of city and highway ,which conveniently, is around 20% based on those Astina figures. It would never be strictly 'fair' but neither is using the NEDC numbers.

But I think I have a semi-solution, change the required percentage to claim 'hypermiler' for NEDC rated cars, that way we're not trying to compare apples to oranges, but just changing what we consider a 'good' result.

Perhaps simply matching NEDC should be enough to get a 'hypermiler' tag.
__________________







Last edited by oldtamiyaphile; 01-24-2016 at 07:46 AM..
  Reply With Quote