View Single Post
Old 01-25-2016, 05:37 PM   #6 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,312
Thanks: 24,439
Thanked 7,386 Times in 4,783 Posts
prove

Quote:
Originally Posted by ConnClark View Post
Ummm... the fact that the vortex generators show a reduction in drag prove that it was supercritical. Bumps corners and curves tend to create more turbulence than a flat plate. If the flow was entirely sub critical all VGs would add is drag.

Unless they faked data the test shows validity. I think you need some time working with a real CFD package or in a wind tunnel or at least objectivly look at the data befor you make claims it has zero validity.
All numerical or wind tunnel scale model testing must be conducted at supercritical Reynolds number or else the output data is meaningless.
There is not a published test which exists in the last 100-years which demonstrates otherwise.
If one doesn't understand dynamic similarity,there's no point pursuing testing of any kind.
If one doesn't understand boundary layer theory they'll never win a technical argument.
I'm in my 42nd year of objective observation.It's my responsibility to throw a caution flag whenever I see rule violation on the field.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
Xist (01-26-2016)