View Single Post
Old 02-05-2016, 08:20 AM   #3 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
GM tried sticking under sized engines in over sized vehicles in the late 80s and early 90s, these vehicles really didn't get noticeably better fuel economy than their larger engine counter parts.
These little engines just got ran a lot harder than the V8 motors and went to the junk yards sooner.
If they were driven properly- not WOT all the time- the strategy probably would have worked and the longevity fine too.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
Xist (02-05-2016)