View Single Post
Old 03-02-2016, 06:57 PM   #41 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,391
Thanks: 24,469
Thanked 7,409 Times in 4,800 Posts
lower speed

I compared the aerodynamic power at 73-mph and 55-mph.The higher speed requires 2.3 X more horsepower to overcome air drag.
If the BSFC of the Toyota's powerplant was constant,then we'd expect the engines fuel requirement for air drag to increase this 2.3 X factor,since it mirrors the power.
Rolling resistance would increase arithmetically as it's basically a linear relationship up to 100-mph or so.
38-39 mpg at 73 is pretty sweet! The EPA numbers were figured at more like 50-mph.

__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
BamZipPow (03-03-2016)