View Single Post
Old 05-03-2016, 02:37 PM   #14 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,933

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 38.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,356
Thanked 4,509 Times in 3,468 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
Humm... Piper Cherokee 180, weight 1230 lbs empty, 2400 max, fuel consumption 8-10 gph. Boeing 747, weigh 128,700 lbs empty, 255,000 max, fuel consumption ~3600 gph (or about the weight of 10 Cherokees).

So yes, I think it's fair to say that heavier aircraft burn more fuel :-)
The Cherokee cruises at 124 kts compared to the 740 at 573 kts. We haven't held enough variables constant to make a comparison.

... and the 747 is ~100x heavier, not 10x.

Economies of scale generally favor larger machines. It would take more fuel to carry the same payload as the 747 using a fleet of Cherokees.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!

Last edited by redpoint5; 05-03-2016 at 02:43 PM..
  Reply With Quote