View Single Post
Old 05-14-2016, 10:27 PM   #8 (permalink)
oldtamiyaphile
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 453 Times in 320 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by He-man View Post
So the engine will burn up at lower rpm so how can the tesla maintain multiple speeds? How will it burn up if the rpm are lower at hwy but it doesn't burn up in stop and go traffic or while maintaining slower speeds?
Less power is required at lower speeds, so less heat is generated. If you asked the same RPM at higher speeds, that's when you'd have issues. Like all engineering, it's a compromise. If you did enough stop go acceleration tests, without letting the motor cool, you'd likely damage it. But again it's been designed for that an likely the electronics will start limiting torque if the motor gets too hot (batteries might be the limiting factor).
__________________






  Reply With Quote