View Single Post
Old 05-17-2016, 03:52 AM   #30 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,460

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,212
Thanked 4,390 Times in 3,364 Posts
I always thought hybrid tech was perfect for heavy hauling. Reducing the need for a higher output engine just to accelerate or climb a grade should improve fuel economy and recapture on downgrades.

Why all the talk of a diesel engine operating under a wide load range? It would operate similarly to a turbine in that it would only run when needed to charge the battery, and during that time would operate at peak efficiency.

Another advantage of a hybrid design is to maintain cabin comfort without having to idle the engine.

The huge drawback to a hybrid design is that it weighs a lot more, and that cuts into the max payload the truck is allowed to haul. Since the primary purpose is to haul a load, this is not an insignificant drawback.

My question is, with all variables concerning payload and route being the same, what is the fuel cost per mile of a hybrid design compared to modern diesel-only tractors?
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote