View Single Post
Old 05-17-2016, 07:39 AM   #58 (permalink)
oldtamiyaphile
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noahfreak View Post
The study didn't take into account the foregone larger vehicle that would be necessary to replace the roof rack. 25% off of a typical car's mpg is still better than most trucks and large SUVs, isn't it?
That's the point I was about to make

I used to drive a 'mid sized' VW Transporter, I didn't use the rook rack often so I removed it when not needed (also it didn't fit in car parks with the rack on).

I now have a 'small' Renault, but I need the roof rack too often to bother taking it off. It also provides a great place to mount a solar panel.

Best ever tank was with the roof rack and solar panel fitted.

The gain by downsizing the vehicle was about 40% factoring in the difference between diesel and petrol.

I don't think there's anywhere near a 25% hit for a standard roof rack (heck even my ~1200lb enclosed trailer only costs about that much - and that's city, it's less on the highway), for a 4x4 style roof cage maybe. I'd guess my Thule Wingbar costs 5% on the highway, so assuming you drive 50/50 city/highway the actual hit would be more like 3%.
__________________






  Reply With Quote