View Single Post
Old 06-01-2016, 06:04 PM   #3 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,457

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,212
Thanked 4,390 Times in 3,364 Posts
Neat stuff. I was surprised to see the tower in the first video taper in stages rather than a continuous taper as seen in the second video.

I always thought the tower anchors had to be very deep to resist the enormous wind loading; I didn't realize they could simply make a wide base and pile dirt on top.

I wonder how feasible it is to use higher strength materials such as carbon fiber to reduce the tower diameter so it will fit under bridges? Perhaps it doesn't have the same crush resistance that concrete does, and I'm sure the cost would be enormous.

Why was steel used in the first place? Seems concrete would be cheaper.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote