View Single Post
Old 06-02-2016, 04:43 AM   #66 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,556 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
Anecdotes and bias. I'm not buying it.

If you wanted to talk about "kinetic ripple", that's what you should have talked about. Blaming one type of car is silly and distracts from the point you're trying to make.
I've been meaning to get back to this one for quite a while.

Blaming one type of car isn't necessarily irrational.

I do it all the time and in my mind I'm rational! (Truth: in my mind I'm not, but on this topic I am!)

For example, there are several types of blame I place specifically on full-size 4x4 pickups and SUVs (even though I have one). You know the ones:

*there's not a scratch on 'em and they have hard tonneaus- tells me the owner threw in the towel on it being anything but a ginormous commuter car.

*lifted, diesel, dually, or some combination thereof- rarely seen doing actual work that requires anywhere near that capacity. Compensating for "shortcomings".

*prone to exaggeration in other areas too, like mpg claims.
__________________


  Reply With Quote