View Single Post
Old 06-25-2016, 12:09 AM   #16 (permalink)
oldtamiyaphile
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
How can the EPA (or anyone) get "realistic" numbers when, as in the cited example, mpg can double just by changing the nut holding the steering wheel? For instance, the previous owner(s) of my Insight had a lifetime average just under 50 mpg (for 50K miles). I've averaged a bit over 70 mpg for 140K miles.

I'm a little skeptical about the doubling, but have always gotten 10-20% better than EPA from my vehicles.

The delta on a hybrid will always be lower as it does some of the hypermiling for you, and it was probably bought by a more genteel driver in the first place.

100% over EPA is definitely possible. Heck I've done a fair few trips that were 100% over NEDC.
__________________






  Reply With Quote