View Single Post
Old 06-28-2016, 06:02 AM   #31 (permalink)
RustyLugNut
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 982
Thanks: 271
Thanked 385 Times in 259 Posts
Because it worked under specific conditions, it is not a viable process?

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedDevil View Post
Under very special conditions, like your extreme lean burn engine with heated intakes running stationary, a minute addition of hydrogen and ozone may have a measurable benefit.
As it apparently solves a problem with that process.
We never have found any proof that it works on an engine under 'normal' conditions.

You can lash ChazInMT for having a high school students viewpoint.
That just indicates it is time to ride this beasty back to where it belongs - the corral, where this subject has already been discussed over and over again.
No, it does not work as HHO scammers claim. But it can be made to work with caveats. Just because mason jars are ineffective on the common auto does not mean the science is bunk. Just because it will never be a market success, does that mean it has no value?

And I was very clear, ChazInMT, as well as others do not have the background to discuss thermochemistry and yet they do. Just because this forum is uneducated in a subject matter, does that mean it belongs in the Corral? Take the subject to a university professor or a specialist in the field and the subject is seen to have possibilities or at least is in need of more research. But, the effect to condense the pressure profile in the combustion chamber can lead to more power produced than the energy to make the HHO. That power comes from the WASTED energy always found in heat engines! For some reason this escapes comprehension.

 
The Following User Says Thank You to RustyLugNut For This Useful Post:
pgfpro (07-01-2016)