View Single Post
Old 07-01-2016, 09:20 AM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
kach22i's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 3,697
Thanks: 34
Thanked 2,429 Times in 1,705 Posts
In the early 1960's brush bristles were experimented with on some of the early small hovercraft (otherwise skirtless).

They discovered brush bristles didn't cut down on the dust being kicked up from the cushion pressure escaping out of the bottom of the hull, and did not contribute to forming an airtight seal either.

About the only thing they did was sweep a surface clean and perhaps soften coming off cushion slightly from impact with the ground. They were dead weight and were abandoned.

In your application I'm guessing the air would pass though unabated, perhaps turbulently and the bristles would not divert the air and the air pressure behind it would push through.

Think of the wind passing through a row of pine trees.

Designed to go just about anywhere over everything, including snow, marshland, roads and water – backwards, forwards and even sideways it employed ‘brushes’ as opposed to a bag skirt for greater versatility. Top speed was a claimed 30mph over water and 45mph over land and it could climb gradients of up to 20%, enabling it to comfortably get up and over most river banks when necessary, we presume.
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

Chin Spoiler:

Rear Spoiler Pick Up Truck

Roof Wing

Last edited by kach22i; 07-07-2016 at 09:49 AM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kach22i For This Useful Post:
aerohead (07-06-2016), Xist (07-01-2016)