With regard to treating members with courtesy, with regard to a given topic: You, RustyLugNut, burned that bridge with me two years ago.
You, RustyLugNut, treated my topic of EGR with tactics that you claimed that people treat anything regarding HHO.
You, RustyLugNut, deliberately misconstrued my data and drew false conclusions, and littered my EGR thread with them.
You, RustyLugNut, appeared not to listen to anything I had to say on the matter of EGR, but you did do a fine job of doing personal attacks.
You, RustyLugNut, even mentioned as much with your supposed "apology" thread. Here, let me quote it for you:
The point is, RustyLugNut, is that you did all of the behaviors you claimed to abhor, then you fall back on "victim status" when things don't go your way.
I do also like the fact, RustyLugNut, that you deleted your crap posts out of my thread, in a dishonest attempt to cover your tracks. However, you will of course notice that you can't delete the material I quoted.
Let's get one thing clear: The meaningful discussion and exchange of ideas to improve fuel economy is harmed by all of the behaviors that YOU YOURSELF, RustyLugNut, exhibited.
For reference, here is your "apology" thread, RustyLugNut ->
EcoModder.Com: This is in reference to the EGR build that T Vago was presenting.
And here's my thread that you shat all over ->
EcoModder.Com: EGR experiment (Increase EGR flow for fuel economy)