View Single Post
Old 08-08-2008, 05:28 AM   #161 (permalink)
blackjackel
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: los angeles
Posts: 119

Whitey - '05 toyota corolla LE
90 day: 28.91 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via AIM to blackjackel Send a message via MSN to blackjackel Send a message via Yahoo to blackjackel
Quote:
Originally Posted by Indianapolis500 View Post
I work at a mcdonalds I take it running off of burger and oil fat for cars is way lot cleaner then then running off of pure hydrogen (or did we forget about the lindenburgh accident) ??????
In keeping with the spirit of the forum, I will try and tone down my response. That statement was preposterous! The Hindenburg had hundred of thousands of gallons of hydrogen in it, and it was coated with a paint similar in composition to thermite (Which burns at 2000 degrees). Furthermore, the Hindenburg was completely enclosed while a car engine has plenty of ventilation from all sides. Not to mention the required spark to ignite the hydrogen needed to be there which can't possibly happen around an automobile engine.

This HHO system does not store hydrogen but pumps it into the air intake as soon as it is produced. There simply can be NO comparison between the Hindenburg and these HHO systems in cars.

__________________
  Reply With Quote