View Single Post
Old 08-04-2016, 10:34 PM   #6 (permalink)
Mustang Dave
Intermediate EcoDriver
 
Mustang Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Northern Arizona - It's a DRY cold..
Posts: 671

Trigger - '07 Ford Mustang V6 Premium Coupe
Team Mustang
Sports Cars
90 day: 32.76 mpg (US)

Big Red (retired) - '89 Ford F-250 4wd Custom
90 day: 18.13 mpg (US)

Big Red II - '13 Ford F-150 FX4
Pickups
90 day: 19.61 mpg (US)
Thanks: 163
Thanked 129 Times in 102 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
Not the best test methodology (driving several thousand miles on one type, then switching to another type), but at least they admit as much.
In my testing of mods, I like to compare a 3-fill average to a 3-fill average from the same time period of the previous year. My fuel log shows the difference:

Switching to Mobil 1 0W-30 from Motorcraft 5W-30 gained ~ .5 MPG.

Pizza pan wheel covers made NO difference in MPG. (I don't care what others have "proven" while still "adjusting the nut behind the steering wheel"), they made NO noticeable difference in my 2007 Ford Mustang's fuel economy.

Programming the ECU in my Mustang for optimum performance with Premium (91 octane) fuel and filling it with premium fuel resulted in a loss of around 1 MPG.

Installing a 25% under-drive crankshaft pulley on the 4-Liter Cologne V-6 gave me a gain of about 1 MPG.

As always, YMMV.
__________________
Fuel economy is nice, but sometimes I just gotta put the spurs to my pony!



Quote:
Originally Posted by thatguitarguy View Post
Just 'cuz you can't do it, don't mean it can't be done...
Quote:
Originally Posted by elhigh View Post
The presence of traffic is the single most complicating factor of hypermiling. I know what I'm going to do, it's contending with whatever the hell all these other people are going to do that makes things hard.

Last edited by Mustang Dave; 08-04-2016 at 10:49 PM..
  Reply With Quote