View Single Post
Old 08-12-2016, 08:40 AM   #10 (permalink)
kach22i
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,158
Thanks: 120
Thanked 2,790 Times in 1,959 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by samwichse View Post
Yes, they could have done much better.
Thank you for the list, but could you please cite your source of information?

I think it's been at least 3 years since I looked at a complete Cd list, certainly improvements have been made fleet wise I can see.

Such a jump may be connected to EPA fuel economy regulations. I wonder if there is a chart for this.

Found this.......(see below)........several charts and graphs in link below.


Corporate Average Fuel Economy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpor...ation_proposal
Quote:
Model year 2012-2016 Obama Administration proposal

The new policy will result in yearly 5% increases in efficiency from 2012 through 2016...........
A 4 or 5 mpg improvement from 2012-2016 (looking at "Agreed standards by model year, 2011-2025" chart in link), I'm guessing much of this because of aerodynamic design effort and study. However I have no support for this belief other than the numbers samwichse posted and my memory of what Cd's used to be a few years ago.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

Chin Spoiler:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...effective.html

Rear Spoiler Pick Up Truck
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...xperiment.html

Roof Wing
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...1-a-19525.html

Last edited by kach22i; 08-12-2016 at 08:45 AM..
  Reply With Quote