View Single Post
Old 09-01-2016, 09:35 AM   #13 (permalink)
Fat Charlie
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
The real problem is that at the design stage, factories want to build one thing and sell it several ways instead of building several things to sell one way.

What idiot would come up with a turbo variant of an existing engine that matched it in any performance metric except maybe emissions? How would anyone pitch that to their bosses? We'll slap a turbo on it, but dial it back so it won't add much power in order to match the mpg of the regular engine. Say another engineering crew has a competing pitch: We'll slap a turbo on it, get a bunch of additional horsepower and it'll only cost us a few mpg on the EPA tests. We'll call this trim level the "Sport" and get an extra $5k for it.

Which team do you think is still going to have a job at the end of the meeting?
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fat Charlie For This Useful Post:
Xist (09-01-2016)