View Single Post
Old 09-03-2016, 12:39 AM   #1 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,465

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,212
Thanked 4,390 Times in 3,364 Posts
Why does Tesla use cylindrical cells instead of prismatic?

I just watched a 40 minute Gigafactory tour video and was surprised to see that the new Tesla will use 2170 cylindrical cells rather than prismatic.

Why is the advantage of cylindrical cells vs prismatic?

I would think they would cost more due to increased use of materials (smaller individual capacities and more material used in the case). The increased casing material would also increase weight. Finally, there would be a lot of empty space with all the voids left by the cylinders not being able to stack flush with each other, so the energy density would be reduced.

When I bought a 20 Ah LiFePO4 battery, the best price I could find was in prismatic cells, with cylindrical being a bit more expensive.

So, what's the advantage? Will prismatic cells die out, with cylindrical being the way of the future?

__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote