View Single Post
Old 11-04-2016, 02:00 PM   #46 (permalink)
NeilBlanchard
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
True enough, but you keep saying ZERO maintenance costs.
I said EV's have zero regular maintenance costs. And ALL vehicle have tires and wipers, etc. - so how does that matter to this discussion?


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
Well, it wears out, doesn't it? That's why I have to replace my spark plugs every 105K miles.
So, you claim they are moving (even though they are not) because they wear out? You keep attempting to redefine words, rather than discuss facts.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
No, because you "maintain" those molecules by getting new ones. But that's aside from the point I was trying to make, which is that batteries (and AFAIK all batteries) degrade over time, because the chemical reactions (in which the atoms are the "moving parts") are not perfectly efficient.

Just for a concrete example, take the battery in the computer I'm using to write this. Doing cat /proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/info (if you run Linux) gives

design capacity: 84240 mWh
last full capacity: 68190 mWh

so despite a very light use cycle (99% of the time it's in a docking station, running off A/C) the battery has lost capacity over the years.

Now with an IC vehicle, when it wears enough that performance degrades, I can fix it with relative ease. (Though my two current vehicles, 1988 and 2000 models, are still going strong as far as engines are concerned.) Can't (again, AFAIK) do something similar with an EV: when the battery degrades too far, the only fix seems to be a complete replacement. Which, if current usage patterns hold, means that 1) people will junk otherwise perfectly servicable vehicles; and 2) people who'd buy inexpensive 20 year old IC-engined vehicles will have no options.
You are making some sort of deflective straw man argument. Electrons are not "moving parts"; no matter how much you want them to be.

Here are the moving parts unique to an EV:

Motor rotor (1)
Its bearings (2)
Two reduction gears (2)
Their bearings (4)

Then there are the parts they have in common with all cars: the differential, U-joints / CVT joints, wheel / brake hubs and their bearings. Oh, and the wheels.

If you can even count all the moving parts in an ICE, then I think you will have to concede that EV's are MUCH easier to maintain, and understand that they will last MUCH longer.

Batteries will last as long as a typical ICE and/or it's transmission. Individual cells and/or modules can be replaced. You continue to overemphasize this; despite a lack of any evidence.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote