View Single Post
Old 11-11-2016, 08:41 PM   #6 (permalink)
oldtamiyaphile
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 453 Times in 320 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by M_a_t_t View Post
From my knowledge usually the more gears the better fuel economy, because of being able to keep the engine in more optimal rpm range.
For NA engines at least, skip shifting (1,3,5) is a thing. It gives you a higher average engine load which works well for oversize engines or low geared cars. I recorded my best ever tank when I started skip shifting my Renault Kangoo (1.6 NA, low geared). Some v8's have shift interlocks that force you to shift 1,4,5,6 for economy reasons.

More gears are more relevant to small turbos (petrol or diesel) where keeping load lighter than 80% is advantageous to avoiding excessive fueling. More gears also means more drive train friction in every gear (even if it's slight).
__________________






  Reply With Quote