View Single Post
Old 11-26-2016, 01:20 PM   #62 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,914
Thanks: 24,000
Thanked 7,227 Times in 4,654 Posts
vacuum

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ecky View Post
It's not all that straightfoward. If you're on the highway with cruise control on, you want to have higher vacuum because this means you're burning the least fuel. However, consider this example BSFC chart for a Ford 2L:



How to read this chart: The contour lines show how many games of fuel are required to make one kilowatt-hour of energy, or in other words, how effectively the engine is converting gasoline into usable energy. More grams to make 1kWh means more waste, so lower is better on this chart. Notice that the engine is most efficient at high load (close to wide open throttle) at lower RPM - so, even though it's burning more fuel than if you used less throttle, it's burning it more efficiently.

This is part of why pulse and glide works - you're running the engine in a more efficient range (low vacuum), but that would cause you to accelerate out of your target speed, so you cycle the engine to maintain speed.

Another example, taller gearing improves fuel economy, but also causes vacuum to decrease.
Remember,that the higher the intake manifold pressure,the less pumping loss for filling the combustion chamber.Also,if you have an intake runner sized specifically for cruise velocity,it's butterfly valve can be wide open,reducing pumping losses as well.Honda did this with their 3-barrel carbureted CVCC engines in the early CRX series,and their mpg has basically not been matched ever since.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
BamZipPow (11-28-2016)