View Single Post
Old 08-12-2008, 01:35 PM   #10 (permalink)
jamesqf
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bicycle Bob View Post
I'd sure like to see the reference for a Stirling or a Turbine that is more efficient than IC.
Any basic physics text should cover it.

Quote:
Electric and steam were both better for simple transmissions with good acceleration; ICE won on range and convenience.
Thermodynamic efficiency doesn't apply to electric motors. Steam is less efficient, which is why we don't have a whole lot of steam locomotives and ships these days.

Quote:
Stirlings and turbines are OK to use up waste heat from ICE, if there's enough to pay for them.
Nope. That's why the development of the turbo-compounding aircraft engine was dropped: it turned out to be more efficient just to run the turbine, and leave off the IC engine. It's also why you see a lot of gas turbines used for power generation, but very few diesels.
  Reply With Quote