View Single Post
Old 12-05-2016, 07:52 PM   #27 (permalink)
oldtamiyaphile
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
But would you be willing to convert it to FWD in order to save weight in the transmission setup?
Would still be RWD, there's still weight to be saved switching from the cast iron 4 speed to a modern alloy 5/6 speed, and lighter diff.

I don't like four cylinder engines, twins and tripples are much more fun, so that narrows my choices a lot.

But it's true the EcoBoost isn't that economical. It scores 4.9l/100km while BMW's Mini 1.2 scores 4.9 and their bigger more powerful 1.5 3cyl gets down to 4.7. Those are NEDC figures, so expect a bigger difference 'real world'.

Plus BMW themselves are saving 300hp is possible from their 1.5:
300+ HP From MINI's New 3 Cylinder Possible According to BMW M - MotoringFile
__________________







Last edited by oldtamiyaphile; 12-10-2016 at 08:38 PM..
  Reply With Quote