View Single Post
Old 12-25-2016, 02:02 AM   #6 (permalink)
oldtamiyaphile
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakobnev View Post
Neutral should beat DFCO hands down.
For a 'normal' car, yes. The situation changes when you have a tiny engine and 2+ tons. With my Petrol Kangoo, neutral coasting was absolutely the way to go, but when I hitched up my trailer for a total weight of 2.3-2.4 tons, I couldn't feel any change in the rate of deceleration when I pushed the clutch in (the effect of the A/C and alternator kicking in was more pronounced), so DFCO was generally the better option.

Same goes for the Trafic, nearly 2 tons and no engine braking to speak of. I'm likely better off loosing a tiny amount of coast distance vs having the engine idling at 1-1.6l/100km. I haven't had a chance to test it yet, but I have tested my Fiat 500 and P&G (neutral or DFCO) doesn't work at all in that one. I don't really have any 'normal' cars
__________________






  Reply With Quote