Thread: AeroWagen
View Single Post
Old 02-07-2017, 11:22 AM   #10 (permalink)
kach22i
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,187
Thanks: 132
Thanked 2,809 Times in 1,973 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stubby79 View Post
I would think the larger rear area of the back would cause more drag than is lost by decreasing the slope of the roof line. You want to minimize said area as much as you can without exceeding a certain slope. Heck, it might be better to exceed it a little if the result was a noticeably smaller back area.
Interesting points, lots to think about. The whole in the air the body leaves is important, but so are the air vectors releasing from the body.

Would the Corvette be part of the Bluff Body family? It certainly is not teardrop shaped beyond the canopy.

Some of the reoccurring issues we have in the forum is that only the side view gets compared to the template, no part of the top view is included, and little other 3D analysis.

I could do a template overlay on the stock and AeroWagen version, and include both side profile and top views, I could even attempt to toss in a cross section at the 3/4 mark.

However I'm not convinced it would prove much, and that full scale testing is the only alternative when splitting hairs as fine as this.

EDIT:

The difference between "b" and "c" is a surprise to me.

http://alfa-img.com/show/lift-coeffi...of-shapes.html


There is a chart floating around the forum which shows Bluff Body lengths or perhaps Semi-Truck lengths with small differences in relation to Cd. If I stumble across it in the next few days I will post it here.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............

Last edited by kach22i; 02-07-2017 at 11:48 AM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kach22i For This Useful Post:
aerohead (02-11-2017)