Thread: AeroWagen
View Single Post
Old 02-08-2017, 10:40 AM   #14 (permalink)
kach22i
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,187
Thanks: 132
Thanked 2,809 Times in 1,973 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
The roofline appears unaltered to the B-pillar. So frontal area is unchanged. The shooting brake roofline has a reverse camber that will allow reattachment of incipient separation.
He has a valid observation, we just need to find the proper language for it.

Frontal area is similar to cross-sectional area, yes?

What is the area at the stern called, the hole in the air which is leftover?

Isn't that called the "virtual tail area" or something like that?

Area of a "truncated foil"?

But the car is not a perfect foil, the tangent lines can be all over the place, and in a 3D vortex generator style of differing pressures, not strictly a 2D sectional observation without termination ends (wing tips).

2011 ƒgƒŒƒbƒNEƒXƒs[ƒhƒRƒ“ƒZƒvƒg | BIKE BINDŽ“]Ž“‹LƒuƒƒO


On a boat this area might be called a "transom board area".

http://newboatbuilders.com/pages/hp.html


Although, if we were talking non-planing hulls, it would be the area below the waterline at the stern/transom that we would be most concerned with, right?

Again, my earlier argument was that the vectors or direction of the air leaving the end of the car is just as important as the rear area it's self.

Extreme examples are a too steep of a fastback, and flat across semi-truck trailer without aero-devices attached.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............

Last edited by kach22i; 02-08-2017 at 10:53 AM..
  Reply With Quote