Thread: The better car?
View Single Post
Old 02-18-2017, 11:17 PM   #85 (permalink)
oldtamiyaphile
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by willie@eco View Post
It was. It was called the Mazda 121 pretty much every where in the world except south korea where it was sold as a Kia Pride and here in the states as the Ford Festiva iirc. Also i think it was changed from 121 to Festiva in Australia after a few years of production. And yeah man i might keep it. Lets see. Haha
The Mazda was built in Japan and was a good little car, the Festiva was built by Kia in Korea and just wasn't.

Quite a few Mazdas were sold here as Fords, and the Ford versions were always a lot worse to drive IMO than the Mazdas. Mazda somehow manages to inject a bit of fun into all their cars, while Ford seemed to concentrate on making everything feel like it was made of wood. Steering, clutches, brakes, suspension tune and gearshifts all felt worse on the Fords, why the didn't just use the Japanese specs is beyond me.
__________________






  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oldtamiyaphile For This Useful Post:
willie@eco (02-18-2017)