View Single Post
Old 03-02-2017, 12:36 AM   #11 (permalink)
Frank Lee
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
"Brake". I'm anal about that sort of thing.

I'm kind of scared of batteries as it seems far too easy for a simple caveman like me to mess them up via over- or under-charging, or charging at too fast a rate. It would be nice to engage the alternator only or mainly when braking but a battery can only take so much at a time.. I see the appeal of "smart" loading strategies and in fact there are plenty of them on new vehicles so if you are succeeding with this great!

For the serious modder a strategy that depends on recharging with wall power has the most fuel efficiency potential. Requires more baby sitting though.

I went with reducing the rpms of all the driven accessories, most of all the alternator. I never did come up with a figure for how much it improved fuel efficiency, if any.

__________________


  Reply With Quote