View Single Post
Old 03-02-2017, 12:34 PM   #25 (permalink)
straight5
EcoModding Learner
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Hendersonville, Tn
Posts: 63

nonikname - '99 Saab 9-5 2.3t
90 day: 33.71 mpg (US)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
There have been several comments about turbocharged engines being different internally with heavier rods, bearing and other parts. That may be generally true, I don't know.
fwiw During the mid to late 1990's, the turbocharged 5 cyl Volvo engine was mostly the same as the NA engine. Internally the only parts that I can remember being different were the piston (for lower compression of course) and the sodium filled exhaust valve. As for the transmissions and gearing - I have no idea if they were different.

I can tell you that I've been very happy with the mpg of my turbo car. My Saab 9-5 turbo has averaged about 32mpg over the last 13,000 miles. The odometer is showing just over 205,000 miles. As the OP and others have pointed out though, I have nothing to compare it to that would be a fair comparison.
__________________
1999 Saab 9-5 sedan 2.3t 5speed
2013 prius 3

Quote:
"God is a God who both created the universe, and also had a plan that included me as an individual human being. And that he has made it possible for me, through this series of explorations, to realize that. It is not just a philosophy, it is a reality of a relationship. "
Francis S Collins - director of the National Human Genome Research Institute
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to straight5 For This Useful Post:
deejaaa (03-04-2017)