View Single Post
Old 03-13-2017, 04:21 AM   #2 (permalink)
Stubby79
Master EcoModder
 
Stubby79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 1,747

Firefly EV - '98 Pontiac Firefly EV
90 day: 107.65 mpg (US)

Little Boy Blue - '05 Toyota Echo
90 day: 33.35 mpg (US)

BlueZ - '19 Nissan 370Z Sport
90 day: 17.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 75
Thanked 576 Times in 426 Posts
I'd think it would be more accurate to calculate it by the weight of cargo - mainly passengers for most of us - being carried, not by using the weight of the vehicle involved. There's nothing gained by moving around several thousand pounds of vehicle. There is something gained by moving around cargo/people.

It wouldn't necessarily reflect poorly on large/heavy vehicles, if you always have passengers. A 400lb mini-van that regularly has 4 passengers will out-do a 1600lb Geo metro with only 1 person in it. Or if you own a truck and are constantly hauling stuff around to your work site, you'd out-perform someone who doesn't move anything but their own self.

I'm of the opinion that a vehicle should be chosen by the purpose it will be put to.

And I doubt CSX is calculating the weight of the vehicle of transportation as part of it. Your own wording says "1 ton of freight 400miles per gal"...not 1 ton of freight & trucks/trains/etc.
  Reply With Quote