View Single Post
Old 03-23-2017, 03:56 PM   #45 (permalink)
DieselJan
Less waste = better FE
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: South Africa, Freestate
Posts: 30
Thanks: 9
Thanked 14 Times in 7 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by craysus View Post
CSRV vs. Poppet Valve - Coates International Ltd.

Using a cammed intake system similar to above, and taking changing the profile based on simple rotation. You could imagine taking this to the next phase, and implementing a Wankel style interface as the cam, instead of the twin cams used byu coates...and therefore simplifying the movement down even further..

Alternatively, electrically controlled "valves" could be utilised on a more conventional head...and if the valves opened / shut normally, but could be extended INTO the cylinder, to increase compression at the desired part of each scycle..(Making the valves a solid tube to take up volume..maybe twisting open / closed to vary between a solid tube and a fuel delivery / exit path)

Just some random thoughts to help with overcoming the requirement for 4 x truck springs being inside a 4" cylinder bore.. (Havent invented a Tardus as yet...sorry..)...
Very interesting link. Looks like a workable improvement.
Also great idea from you, I think? Increase compression ratio after TDC with the valves to burn fuel better and get more power to wheels.

Hi Cajunfj40
I love Ecomodder and mean no harm. I know it is difficult to have threads that doesn't drift, just had a suggestion. Things like in the link above IMHO will bring the gains I'm hoping for. After that type of mechanical changes we can start improving with electronics, etc.
  Reply With Quote