View Single Post
Old 04-09-2017, 09:32 PM   #17 (permalink)
oldtamiyaphile
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 453 Times in 320 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by pete c View Post
Maybe I'm missing something here, but as I said before, if 2 engines are the same displacement, the turbo one, if it is making boost is making a lot more power. If you back off the throttle and run it off boost, the NA motor will get better mileage, partly because of the drag of the turbo, but more so because it is a low compression engine.
Yes, but there's a middle ground. Running just barely any boost and staying out of enrichment.

At 50MPH my Fiat gets 70- 80MPG. My 2 ton van (diesel) gets 60+ MPG @45MPH.

So it's not all bad for turbos, but I'd say the amount of optimization that went into those engines is well beyond what a bolt on DIY kit would offer.
__________________






  Reply With Quote