View Single Post
Old 06-07-2017, 02:54 PM   #196 (permalink)
slowmover
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 731 Times in 553 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by gumby79 View Post

Slowmover Who is burning more fuel to go camping the Aero Tonto or the other 6 5th wheels hear with me?
Another option would be one of those fugly 4x4 van conversions from ford talk about aero disaster.

Do the contractor packs have inside door handles? They are normally designed to keep people out not safety in side.

8501 lbs +10,000 tunge pull trailer "rating " 4,000 front axel 6400per tire pair. Empty is 3500 F 2500 R
I always like your posts, sir, but sometimes miss connections being made.

A vehicle for camping is compared by its capacities: X people over Y nights at Z rate of consumption. Where all else is identical.

Fuel to get to & from a particular location is less of a concern. Length of ownership, thus vehicle life, is the real key to economy. FE comes in as relevant after the big data set is done.



Don't put the cart before the horse.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to slowmover For This Useful Post:
gumby79 (06-09-2017)