View Single Post
Old 06-23-2017, 04:22 PM   #208 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,825

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 43.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,328
Thanked 4,481 Times in 3,446 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by sendler View Post
China would be a starving mess right now, begging with it's hand out if it had the 3 Billion people it was headed for instead of 1.4.
.
I hope you can understand that perpetual growth on a finite planet is not possible. We have to develope a new economic system and make a transition to the end of growth.
Perhaps China did need a brief period of negative population growth, but 1 birth per every 2 couples is drastic and disastrous. I don't know what the magic number should be, but it certainly shouldn't be 1:2. Perhaps a goal of 1.8:2 for an extended period of time.

A negative population growth is just as unsustainable as a positive one. In an ideal world, we would all agree on what the ideal number of people is, and maintain it.

I don't see human behavior ever planning for the end of growth. We would never elect a politician that promised to deliver 98% of last years GDP, for instance. Growth is in our DNA.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!